Calculate absolute uncertainty from relative uncertainty, from raw measurements (range/2 method), convert between absolute and relative forms, and propagate uncertainties through addition, subtraction, multiplication and division — with full step-by-step working for IB Physics, A-Level, and science labs.
✓Verified: JCGM 100:2008 (GUM) & IB Physics Data Booklet —
📊 Select Calculation Mode
📌 Convert relative (percentage) uncertainty to absolute uncertainty. Formula: Δx = (RU% / 100) × measured value
x
The measured or mean value
Enter a valid measured value.
%
Enter as a percentage (e.g. 2 for 2%)
Enter relative uncertainty ≥ 0.
📌 Enter repeated measurements to find absolute uncertainty using the range/2 method. Common in IB Physics labs. Enter at least 2 values separated by commas.
Separate values with commas or spaces — all in the same units — minimum 2 values
The international standard for measurement uncertainty, published by the Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology. Defines absolute uncertainty, relative uncertainty, and the propagation rules used in this calculator.
Official IB Physics formula reference. The uncertainty propagation rules in this calculator exactly match the IB Physics HL and SL lab report requirements.
Formulas used: Δx = (RU% / 100) × x | RU% = (Δx / x) × 100From raw data: Δx = (x_max − x_min) / 2 | mean = ∑x / nAdd/Subtract: Δz = Δx + ΔyMultiply/Divide: %z = %x + %y then Δz = (%z/100) × z
For powers: Δ(x^n) / (x^n) = n × (Δx/x). Range method uses maximum uncertainty; for better estimates use standard deviation of the mean.
Absolute uncertainty is the margin of possible error in a measurement, expressed in the same physical units as the measurement itself. Every measurement ever taken has some uncertainty — no measuring instrument is perfectly precise. Scientists report measurements as a value plus or minus the uncertainty: x ± Δx. For example, a mass of 50.0 ± 0.5 g means the true mass is somewhere between 49.5 g and 50.5 g.
Absolute Uncertainty vs Relative Uncertainty — Which to Use When
These two forms express the same measurement quality, just differently:
Absolute uncertainty (Δx): In the same units as the measurement. Example: ±0.5 cm. Easy to interpret physically. Used when reporting results, adding and subtracting measurements.
Relative uncertainty (or percentage uncertainty): As a fraction or percent of the measured value. Example: 2%. Dimensionless — allows comparison across different measurements. Used when multiplying and dividing measurements, and for assessing measurement quality.
IB Physics lab example: Five time measurements: 4.32, 4.45, 4.38, 4.41, 4.35 s
Mean = (4.32+4.45+4.38+4.41+4.35)/5 = 21.91/5 = 4.38 s
Absolute uncertainty = (4.45 − 4.32)/2 = 0.13/2 = 0.065 s ≈ 0.07 s
Reported result: 4.38 ± 0.07 s
Error Propagation Rules — The Key to IB and A-Level Labs
When measurements with uncertainties are combined mathematically, the uncertainty propagates into the result. These are the four essential rules:
Operation
Formula
Uncertainty Rule
Example
Addition z = x+y
Δz = Δx + Δy
Add absolute uncertainties
(10.0±0.2)+(5.0±0.3) = 15.0±0.5
Subtraction z = x−y
Δz = Δx + Δy
Add absolute uncertainties
(10.0±0.2)−(3.0±0.1) = 7.0±0.3
Multiplication z = x×y
%z = %x + %y
Add relative uncertainties
50×20 = 1000 with (1%+5%) = 6% = ±60
Division z = x/y
%z = %x + %y
Add relative uncertainties
50/20 = 2.5 with (1%+5%) = 6% = ±0.15
Powers and Roots in Error Propagation
For powers: Δ(x^n) / (x^n) = |n| × (Δx/x). The relative uncertainty is multiplied by the power. Example: if radius r = 5.0 ± 0.1 cm (2% relative), then r² has 2×2% = 4% relative uncertainty. Volume of sphere (4/3)πr³ has 3×2% = 6% relative uncertainty from the radius alone.
Absolute Uncertainty for Single Instrument Readings
For a single reading from an instrument (not repeated measurements), the absolute uncertainty is typically determined by the instrument’s resolution:
Analogue instruments (ruler, thermometer): ± half the smallest graduation. A ruler with 1 mm divisions: ±0.5 mm
Digital instruments (digital balance, multimeter): ± the last digit. A balance reading 12.34 g: ±0.01 g
Stopwatch (reaction time dominated): human reaction time ±0.2 s dominates over the instrument precision of ±0.01 s
Volumetric glassware: absolute uncertainty is printed on the glassware (e.g. ±0.05 mL for a 25 mL burette)
Why Absolute Uncertainty Adds in Subtraction
Students often wonder why you add uncertainties even when subtracting. The reason: uncertainty represents the worst-case error in either direction. If value A could be 0.2 higher OR lower, and value B could be 0.1 higher OR lower, then the worst case for A−B occurs when A is at its maximum and B is at its minimum, giving a difference that is 0.2+0.1=0.3 units larger than the nominal result. Both absolute uncertainties add, always.
💡 Practical warning — subtracting similar values: When you subtract two measurements that are nearly equal, the result has a very large relative uncertainty even if the absolute uncertainties are small. Example: (100.0 ± 0.5) − (98.0 ± 0.5) = 2.0 ± 1.0. The absolute uncertainty 1.0 is 50% of the result 2.0 — 50% relative uncertainty! This is why direct difference measurements should be avoided when possible in experimental design.
Frequently Asked Questions
Absolute uncertainty (Δx) is the possible error in a measurement, expressed in the same units. Written as x ± Δx. To convert from relative uncertainty: Δx = (RU%/100) × x. From raw measurements: Δx = (max − min)/2. Example: 50 g with 2% relative uncertainty → Δx = (2/100)×50 = 1 g → result: 50 ± 1 g.
Range/2 method: Δx = (max − min)/2. Example: measurements 10.2, 10.5, 10.3 cm. Max=10.5, min=10.2. Δx = (10.5−10.2)/2 = 0.15 cm. Mean = (10.2+10.5+10.3)/3 = 10.33 cm. Report: 10.3 ± 0.2 cm (rounded to match decimal places). This is the standard IB Physics lab method. For more rigorous analysis, use the standard deviation of the mean (SEM = s/√n).
Absolute uncertainty: in measurement units (±0.5 cm). Relative/percentage uncertainty: dimensionless fraction or percent of the measured value. RU% = (Δx/x)×100. They carry the same information, just expressed differently. Use absolute uncertainty for: reporting results, addition/subtraction propagation. Use relative/percentage for: multiplication/division propagation, comparing precision of different measurements or instruments.
For both addition and subtraction, ADD the absolute uncertainties: Δz = Δx + Δy. Example addition: (10.0±0.2) + (5.0±0.3) = 15.0±0.5. Example subtraction: (10.0±0.2) − (3.0±0.1) = 7.0±0.3. The rule is the same for both because uncertainty is always worst-case — the errors could go in opposite directions making the difference maximum.
For multiplication or division: (1) Find %uncertainty of each measurement: %x = (Δx/x)×100, %y = (Δy/y)×100. (2) Add them: %z = %x + %y. (3) Calculate result: z = x×y or z = x/y. (4) Convert to absolute: Δz = (%z/100)×z. Example: density = (50±1 g)/(25±2 cm³). %mass=2%, %vol=8%. %density=10%. Density=2.0 g/cm³. Δdensity=0.10×2.0=0.2 g/cm³. Result: 2.0±0.2 g/cm³.
In IB Physics (both HL and SL), absolute uncertainty is the maximum possible error in a measurement, written as x ± Δx with matching units and decimal places. The IB Data Booklet specifies: for analogue instruments, Δx = ± half the smallest scale division. For digital instruments, Δx = ± the last digit. Propagation rules are the same as above. IB lab reports must show all measurements with appropriate absolute uncertainties and propagate them through calculated quantities.
Format: value ± uncertainty with matching decimal places and units. Round uncertainty to 1-2 significant figures first, then round the value to match. Correct: 12.4 ± 0.2 cm (both 1 decimal place). Incorrect: 12.43 ± 0.2 (mismatched decimal places). In scientific notation: (1.24 ± 0.02) × 10¹ cm. For IB Physics data tables, always include the ± uncertainty header in column titles.
Fractional uncertainty = Δx/x (dimensionless ratio). Percentage uncertainty = (Δx/x)×100 (expressed as %). Both are the same thing with different scaling. Example: mass 85 g, Δm = 2 g. Fractional = 2/85 = 0.0235. Percentage = 2.35%. In multiplication/division propagation, you can use either fractional or percentage uncertainties (they give the same final answer); just be consistent.
Because the absolute uncertainties add while the result becomes small. Example: (100.0±0.5) − (98.0±0.5) = 2.0±1.0. The result has 50% relative uncertainty! Even though each measurement is only 0.5% uncertain, the difference is 50% uncertain. This is called the “catastrophic cancellation” problem. To avoid it: design experiments to measure the quantity of interest directly rather than taking differences of similar values, or increase the difference between measurements to reduce relative uncertainty.
For an analogue ruler with 1 mm (0.1 cm) smallest division: absolute uncertainty = ±0.5 mm = ±0.05 cm. For a 30 cm ruler measuring 15.6 cm: relative uncertainty = (0.05/15.6)×100 = 0.32%. Note: this is the instrument uncertainty only. If you are measuring the position of a moving object, or if the object’s boundary is not clear, the actual absolute uncertainty is much larger. In practice, reading uncertainty is often ±1 mm for student measurements.
For z = x^n: %z = n × %x. The relative uncertainty is multiplied by the power. Example: radius r = 5.0 ± 0.1 cm. %r = 2%. Volume = (4/3)πr³: %V = 3 × 2% = 6%. V = (4/3)π(5.0)³ = 523.6 cm³. ΔV = (6/100)×523.6 = 31.4 ≈ 30 cm³. Report: 520 ± 30 cm³. Higher powers amplify uncertainty more — this is why accurate radius measurements are critical when calculating volumes of spheres or cylinders.